05 May 2007

Wikipedia - The dust settles on Goreball Warming

The people have decided after six days of intense debate on the subject. Our favorite admin, jc37, has taken the liberty to reach a compromising close.
The result of the debate was No consensus - First of all, this falls under "Supporter/critic of X", and is not a "not" category per se. Second, whether global warming of any particular type is notable is beyond the scope of this discussion. But even discounting those comments, it still came up No consensus. A remaining main concern is that it's essentially unfair to single out one support/critic category, and not the rest. So I think at this point, the next step, if someone is still interested, would be to nominate all the subcategories of Category:Wikipedians by political issue in one or more group nominations. Otherwise, repeated nominations of these categories are starting to look like WP:SNOW discussions resulting in No consensus/keeps. - jc37 09:50, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Aye, lads. Team Global Warming Skeptic has survived a potential blow. If they go too, so must all other political issues.

I'm glad there are truly smart people out there on Wikipedia.
Keep per WP:IAR. Though as stated above, this is not a vote, however if we're all voting, then I say that the skeptics shouldn't be silenced like the Church of Global Warming here would like to have done.--Zeeboid 13:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home